It has begun.
Subscription-based, streaming video services have finally
arrived in Australia in 2015.
We were the last great frontier. The developing world doesn't yet have the required technological infrastructure, so we were the gold nugget. The prospector's fantasy.
No more DVD's. No more paying high prices for digital ownership. Whatever movies and TV shows you want, when you want them. On whatever device you like: phone, TV, ipad, whatever.
To top it off, as an audience member, you now have multiple subscription video providers available: Foxtel's 'Presto', Fairfax's 'Stan', the Australian stalwart 'Quicklix', and the US juggernaut 'Netflix' (arriving in March 2015).
Fantastic for audiences. Convenience, choice, and value.
Fantastic for film and TV makers. Dependable revenue streams, happy audiences, and a legal alternative to piracy.
Everyone wins, right?
If only it all worked as advertised.
And, once again, when it comes to gaining access to the conveniences of the future, Australia has pulled the short straw.
There are notable flaws in each service (aside from Netflix, which hasn't arrived yet) that bear delineating, but the overwhelming theme you need to know is this:
There is barely any content in these services worth the asking price.
Sigh.
Let's start with Foxtel's 'Presto'. I had a delightful conversation recently, regarding the launch of Presto, with a Senior Executive from Foxtel. A really delightful person, who genuinely cares about audience curation and supporting filmmakers. I suggested that, from my research, the exposed skeleton of 'Presto' had barely enough content to keep a person subscribed longer than three months.
The answer was refreshingly candid. The executive said, "I wouldn't pay for the service myself."
On to 'Quickflix'. Aside from the rather glaring red flag that 'Quickflix' still puts significant efforts into its DVD mailing service, a simple check also reveals that the content on their streaming service can best be described as...minimalist.
Couple this dearth of content with the galling fact that 'Quickflix' offers newer 'Premium' content, for example the latest 'Walking Dead' TV series, however you have to pay an additional $45 (!) to get access to it. How could a paid-up, long-term subscriber take this two-tiered content delineation as anything but a slap in the face?
Which leads us to the shadowy figure of Australian streaming, known only as 'Stan'.
'Stan' launched with great acclaim. Exclusive premium content like 'Better Call Saul'. A service usable across multiple devices and operating systems, including Android and iOS apps. Let's not forget, a name imbued with hipster-cool.
'Stan'.
But alas.
'Stan' likes to play hard to get. Peruse the 'Stan' website, and you soon realise that the company would like your credit card details, for your 'free trial', without providing any detail of what is in the film and TV catalogue.
Don't believe me? Check it out yourself:
https://www.stan.com.au/
I have pored over the site. There is no way to find detail on what content the service offers without signing up, in some way.
And then, to add insult to injury, I recently received word of a breakfast event for Screen Producers, that is designed to 'Get to know Stan'. The exact description is:
'Get to know Stan, what their plans are, and how local producers may benefit as Stan Director of Content and Product, Nick Forward, joins...for an intimate and insightful Q&A.'
But here's the kicker. It costs between $25 and $40 to attend this event.
Uh...what?
'Stan' should be clamoring to get local Producers on side for exclusive content deals. Paying to be pitched a streaming service, by a content delivery middle-man, is COMPLETELY backwards.
Which brings us to the real conclusion here.
These middle-men still don't seem to understand. They don't realise they actually have no right to exist.
Delivery platforms exist at the whim of the audience and the makers. As soon as a middle-man starts to believe they have a reason to exist outside of this feedback loop, they are doomed by their avarice.
Broadcast TV didn't learn this lesson, and now it is dying off slowly. Recorded music didn't learn this lesson, and Apple stole their lunch money while the economics of their entire industry flipped upside-down.
Are video streaming middle-men seriously going to make this same mistake again? It's as ludicrous as when the 'Quickflix' CEO
wrote an open letter to Netflix, effectively saying 'stop allowing Australians to access your cheaper service, with more content available, because it isn't fair'.
Fair to whom, exactly?
If you mistreat your audience/customers/clients/fans/etc, they will cease to support you.
Everyone understands this fact as a matter of pure common sense.
And yet we still continue to expect audiences to accept a second-rate video streaming service, with dated or non-existent content, and say "thank you"?
Oh sure, but keep blaming piracy for dwindling audiences.
Hogwash.
